🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that phones and platforms are "robbing our children's childhood". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an similar ban remains "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," said the European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have raised concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the state level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law capping under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring guardian approval for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "might backfire". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this international conversation continues, the steps of this nation and others show that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.